[bange]

Back in the good old days, Microsoft did desktops, Google stuck to search and Apple made toys for people in polo necks. No more.
The superpowers of the technology world are at war, and like real wars, the battle is happening on several fronts. They're fighting on the desktop, they're fighting on mobile phones, they're fighting in the browser and they're fighting in your front room.
Who will prevail, and who will end up in a bunker? We chart the key battlegrounds in the fight for the future.
The home front
Despite the bad publicity surrounding Windows Vista, Microsoft continues to rule the desktop. It successfully saw off the threat of Linux on netbooks by resurrecting Windows XP earlier this year, and the launch of Windows 7 should keep existing Windows users loyal to Microsoft.

As ever, the year of desktop Linux doesn't appear to be the one we're in. Cracks are appearing, however. The PC market is becoming stratified, with Windows on commodity kit and Apple selling Macs to people with money.
According to research firm NPD, in June Apple had an incredible 91 per cent of revenue market share for systems costing $1,000 or more. Apple is also moving into Microsoft's most crucial territory: the enterprise.
Apple has licensed Exchange and built it into OS X's standard mail and calendar apps. The move appears to have rattled Microsoft: in August it announced the demise of its Entourage application for OS X; it is to be replaced by that enterprise favourite, Outlook.
Apple also has the much-rumoured Apple Tablet. Pundits are already breathlessly predicting that this will revolutionise computing. It may well do, but as no-one has actually seen a spec sheet, let alone the actual device (at the time of writing, no hard information has been leaked or published), for now this one needs to be filed under wishful thinking.
As does Google's Chrome OS. The OS will ship next year, and will initially be for netbooks only. Getting an operating system to support the myriad configurations of normal PCs is much more difficult, which means it'll probably be years before Chrome OS is more than vapourware for the average PC user.
The war in the skies
Though it may seem surprising, Microsoft isn't a late convert to the idea of cloud computing: it was punting Software as a Service and hosted applications through Application Service Providers in the 1990s. Sadly, neither PCs nor connections were fast enough to make that viable (or affordable – this was in the days of pay-per-minute internet access).
Now that we do have the horsepower, Google has stolen much of Microsoft's thunder. However, its cloud applications aren't really denting Microsoft's business empire – and Microsoft's forthcoming web-based Office apps look very good indeed.
Significantly, these will run on any platform, including Macs and Nokia mobile phones, which suggests that Microsoft now sees Windows and applications as two distinct product lines.
The big enemy here isn't Google: it's a general lack of trust in cloud computing. As security expert Bruce Schneier writes in The Guardian, "You don't want your critical data to be on some cloud computer that abruptly disappears because its owner goes bankrupt. You don't want the company you're using to be sold to your direct competitor. You don't want the company to cut corners, without warning, because times are tight. Or raise its prices and then refuse to let you have your data back. These things can happen with software vendors, but the results aren't as drastic."
Computing is moving inexorably towards the cloud, but companies with mission critical data are considerably more cautious.
As for Apple, it's not really a player in cloud computing just yet. Its paid-for MobileMe service is nice, but it's very much a niche product for Mac fans, although indications are that Apple is thinking of something more ambitious: the firm's building an enormous data centre in North Carolina, which seems a bit of overkill if it wants to use it just for serving up iTunes downloads.

Computing News

World War 3.0: Apple vs Google vs Microsoft

Who will emerge victorious in the fight for the future?

By Gary Marshall
14 hours ago | [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]

Page 1: The home front - and the battle of the skiesPage 2: Mobile divisions and the forces' sweethearts

The mobile divisions
Apple's iPhone has changed everything. To use a rather crude analogy, Windows Mobile is a peashooter compared to the iPhone's atomic bomb. Since its launch, it's laid waste to Microsoft's mobile ambitions and generated an enormous amount of light and heat.
Microsoft's response, Windows Phone 7, won't be out until next year – and by then Apple will have its fourth iPhone out. Right now Windows Mobile 6.5 is desperately outgunned, and equally desperate phone firms are building their own user interfaces to try and persuade the public that Windows Mobile is still relevant.
But it isn't working: according to the latest smartphone figures from analysts at Canalys, Apple is selling nearly twice as many iPhones as the entire Windows Mobile portfolio – 5.2 million in the second quarter of 2009 compared to 3.4 million for Microsoft – and boasts a global market share of 13.4 per cent to Windows Mobile's nine per cent.
原帖地�: How To Make Money Online [Only registered and activated users can see links. ]
Microsoft's share of the mobile market looks like being in terminal decline, and Windows Phone 7 will need to be extraordinary if it's going to reverse that.
Google's picking up market share too, although not to the same extent as Apple: its Android platform shipped on 1.1 million devices in the second quarter of 2009, giving it a 2.8 per cent market share.

More devices are incoming from firms including HTC and Motorola, which should boost sales further, but there's a problem with Android phones: as with PCs, manufacturers can make whatever devices they like to run the OS.
When we previewed Android earlier this year, we predicted that it would suffer from uninspiring me-too devices, and that's exactly what seems to be happening: to date, Android phones are struggling to match, let alone beat, the iPhone. The applications matter too.
Apple leads the pack here with its App Store, but developers aren't entirely happy with it. The sheer volume of applications means that there's a race to the bottom, and applications need to cost 99 cents to stand a chance of selling.
Factor in the chaotic and controversial approvals procedure that often blocks or restricts perfectly respectable programs, and the demands of network operators to prevent applications such as Skype from working over 3G, and there are cracks in Apple's glossy facade.
That isn't a major problem just now – Apple has the customers, and we'll be amazed if its exclusivity deals make it into 2010 – but if Microsoft and Google raise their game it could mean that the best application developers jump ship. There's already quite a lot of turmoil in this fast-moving market.
Apple-watcher [Only registered and activated users can see links. ] has been contacted by a number of iPhone developers who have been approached by Microsoft in the hope that they'll build applications for Microsoft's platform.
The platform isn't Windows Mobile, though: it's the Zune. Either Microsoft intends to take the Zune into iPhone territory, or it's making its mobile strategy up as it goes along. It's anyone's guess which right now.
The forces' sweethearts
Every war has its soundtrack, and in this one it's being downloaded from Apple servers and played on Apple's software. Apple's iTunes dominates music – it's the US's largest music retailer – and in Europe its video selection is miles ahead of the competition.
The Zune is a decent effort in the US, but MP3 players are a declining, commoditised market: even Apple recognises that, hence the iPhone.
With the Zune, Microsoft is spending a great deal of time and money chasing a market that Apple is getting out of.
Apple TV is a dud, however, and in the US there are many more people watching video on demand via Media Center PCs or Xboxes. Despite its best efforts, Google isn't a player here (no pun intended): YouTube's copyright-flouting past means that mainstream entertainment firms are still wary of it, so they're putting their content on rivals such as Hulu instead.
There's one part of entertainment where Microsoft rules, though, and that's gaming. The Mac simply isn't an important gaming platform, whatever Mac fans might say. While the iPod/iPhone platform has become successful for casual gaming, it's no Xbox. That might change with the aforementioned Mysterious Magic Apple Tablet Of Joy And Wonder, but for console gaming it's a battle between Microsoft, Sony and Nintendo.
Microsoft also has Project Natal up its sleeve, the controller-free gesture recognition system that wowed this year's E3 show. If it's as good as Microsoft says it is – and developers seem to be backing it up here – then the company could be about to give Nintendo a serious headache.
The Apple Tablet That Cures All Ills may be important in another market, however: reading. To date, neither Microsoft nor Apple have dipped their toes into the ebook market, leaving it to the likes of Amazon with its Kindle.
Apple is certainly capable of 'doing an iPod' to the ebook market – moving in late and dominating the entire market – but for now that's simply speculation: there's no hardware to back up the claims that Apple's tablet is going to be a must-have.
The art of war
Predicting victors isn't easy, but we'll have a go. Barring a major cock-up, Apple will continue to sell stacks of iPhones. Google's Android will sell too, but not as well. Windows Mobile will continue to decline until Windows Phone 7 appears, and possibly for a while after that too.

Chrome OS won't be a big deal on desktops in the foreseeable future, Windows 7 and Office 2010 will sell stacks, and Apple will continue to dominate the market for really expensive personal computers.
Microsoft's web applications will get the numbers but Google will get the headlines, the Zune will never rule the world the way the iPod does and Windows will remain the operating system of choice for large enterprises.
Then again, wars aren't predictable. There are too many variables, and random events can easily snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. A single shot can start a war, and a single mistake can undo years of progress – so while our predictions seem safe from the certainty of our bunker, in the real world things are likely to be much more messy, more complicated and more surprising.
Which is, of course, what makes watching things unfold all the more interesting.

[Dordhs]

we figured out its the wrong house. not my car.If you use google earth the program which often gives you different results from the site it gives you the house to the right of his. You can tell if you count, or by his is the one with the dead grass, which we now no why being it has no shade at all.